li ning badminton racket power x series player edition

Lining have fashion to many series.
In Indonesia they accept Series:
Aeronaut, 3D Calibar, Turbo Charging, Tectonic, Windstorm, Windlite, Air Force, Thou Force, Super Forcefulness, Super Series (SS), Jojo, etc......
Joined:

November 28, 2018

Messages:

268

Likes Received:

121

Location:

UK

Wow. As if we don't know that.
In my country Yonex also has several series:

Expensive, very expensive, less expensive, cheap, not very cheap, very inexpensive, not expensive non inexpensive, etc...
Joined:

Jul 8, 2009

Messages:

78

Likes Received:

20

Location:

Cali

Seriously who cares if the rackets aren't hyped? The 9000c performs meliorate than any other current high ends in the market imo. Sometimes the perfect balance and weight is more of import than stupid tech that yous tin barely feel. And information technology'south also a plus that I'm not 1 of the 80 per centum of people in the club with astroxes.
Joined:

Feb x, 2019

Messages:

one,362

Likes Received:

568

Location:

Republic of indonesia

at some bespeak i would agree with you. Most of the high tech stuff are simply stupid marketing gimmic. A well build racket with a perfect fit spec would overperform whatever high tech Yonex had. & i too dont want to purchase 88D just coz at that place is way to many role player own it.
But we are talking about business hither. We talk about selling, money, & turn a profit. Without those, any company would fall. To achieve that, it crave marketing strategy. Lining are a keen noise manufacturer but if they fail to catch our eye & lure u.s. to buy, eventually Lining volition plummet & that would heart breaking for certain.
Joined:

Oct xix, 2018

Messages:

i,528

Likes Received:

674

Occupation:

Software Engineer

Location:

Hyderabad

You and me won't only a lot of people will, I practise admit that Li Ning produces rackets that actually aid and enhance ability for well-nigh players. The problem comes when deciding which racket to buy, 7000, 8000 or 9000C? all accept same specs. Tectonic 7 and nine (4u) accept aforementioned specs with minor upgrades like 76 holes, thinner shaft. Rackets are good but disruptive to choose cause they are redundant.
I got 100zz(4u) less than a week ago and didn't get risk to try it in lucifer situation but had only few like shooting fish in a barrel hits and for now all I tin can say clearly is this racket felt slower in air compared to my N80 II (3u) and clearly stiffer, Information technology feels dainty, nimble, solid and promising to a skilful noise merely non significantly ameliorate than N80 II especially given the speed tradeoff. My opinion may evolve equally I am going to stick for a few months to 100zz, during that I am hoping to get one more speedier racket possibly TC80 or T9 (4u).

All I desire to say is 100zz seems like a good racket but so far I am unable to experience the hype, or my sensibilities are non strong enough to resonate with such fine levels of detail. Coming to Li Ning they take 4 TC, 4AN, iv TT with same specs and marketing team is doing awefully nothing regarding this [add to this the awefully depression reviews for LN's], yonex just has merely one 100zz. Information technology volition b very hard for an average joey to cull a LN noise, It was for me 1.5 years agone and only reviews and communication from forum helped me choose.
Sushi Bear Regular Fellow member

Joined:

Apr 8, 2020

Letters:

21

Likes Received:

three

Location:

PH

I have to hold, not to mention nigh club players get for the stiff rackets without considering their skill level. It can be one thing if you can make use of the "technologies" 100%, simply let'due south face it nosotros're non pros and role player level is subjective. Ane may seem like a beginner, just in his perspective is already an intermediate. While I practice capeesh that LN gives the states a lot of choices, it is confusing as there are a lot of overlaps betwixt models. As someone coming from YY rackets and desire to go into other brands, I don't even know where to start cause specs tin can only give so much without bodily testing which about people don't have the gamble to be able to.
Joined:

Jul 8, 2009

Messages:

78

Likes Received:

20

Location:

Cali

The fashion I meet it, the high end aeronauts are pretty much the same racket with unlike residual and weight. Information technology's like having an ax 88d with various remainder variations in add-on to merely the overall weight. And yes, it's stupid that the 9000c and 7000b has the aforementioned spec. Given that the price difference is minimal if there's one at all, accept information technology as a paint job choice? Like how YY has multiple pigment jobs for the same noise.
Joined:

Mar 26, 2020

Messages:

33

Likes Received:

41

Location:

U.s.a.

7000b and 9000c are non the same rackets. The difference is in the grip size. 7000b is 82.6mm while the 9000c is 79.4mm. From what I sympathize, the difference is in the head weight.
Joined:

Jul 29, 2009

Messages:

941

Likes Received:

139

Location:

Toronto

Worth noting that the north american site uses standard 3u, 4u, etc. while Li Ning typically uses specific weight ranges +/- one gram. So the NA site will have way more than racquets that look like the aforementioned specs compared to their international catalogue.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
Sushi Bear Regular Member

Joined:

April 8, 2020

Letters:

21

Likes Received:

iii

Location:

PH

Anyone tried both the 9000C and Tectonic vii and can give their stance on either of the rackets. Rating of 1-10 in Power, Speed, Command would be appreciated every bit I've been hearing good things about them both. Thank you
Joined:

Oct 19, 2018

Messages:

1,528

Likes Received:

674

Occupation:

Software Engineer

Location:

Hyderabad

You lot can cheque review past Volant
7C:

7I:

7:

7D:

Review by BRR.
7:

7D: https://www.youtube.com/watch?5=6kPcdOGUy-thousand&list=PLhnEzj2ZHTVljOxGmPA2nLxuuhi7I7Nxz&index=36
Over very positive reviews.
Fast and easy rackets with smashing stability and control.
Joined:

Mar 26, 2020

Letters:

33

Likes Received:

41

Location:

USA

Tectonic seven is an fifty-fifty balanced racket while the 9000c carries more weight in the head. Tec7 is more than flexible, faster and very easy to play with. If you can handle the additional weight go for the 9000c. Meridian end power and control are improve on the 9000c while speed and ease of use are tec7'due south attributes. Once yous go used to the speed of tec7 and get your timing right the power is nonetheless there and your arm will thanks for choosing tec7 simply all out power is better on 9000c.
If you think a scale helps
9000c power 10, speed 7, control 9, ease of use eight
Tec7 power viii, speed x, control eight, ease of utilise 10
TigerSmash Regular Member

Joined:

December 30, 2009

Letters:

313

Likes Received:

41

Location:

United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland

They are both S1 per the catalogue, 79.375mm.
Joined:

Jul viii, 2009

Messages:

78

Likes Received:

20

Location:

Cali

Hmm interesting. I always felt the 9000c is a bloody fast racket for its spec. Similar opinions can be found in this thread. It's as fast as my previous arc 11 and significantly faster than n9ii.
Joined:

Mar 26, 2020

Messages:

33

Likes Received:

41

Location:

United states of america

Aye. It is quite fast for information technology's spec. For me among the 3u rackets I used, the gold standard for speed is bravesword 12 and Nanoflare 800. When compared to those 9000c is non equally quick hence the 7.
Sushi Bear Regular Member

Joined:

April eight, 2020

Messages:

21

Likes Received:

3

Location:

PH

Interesting, if it is as fast as the arc 11 so I would say that is around the correct speed for me. Current racket that I'grand using is the 88s in 4u (2020) and felt that was too fast for my liking. While previous dissonance AX99 in 4u felt too sluggish. So something in the middle would exist groovy. Some other notation to consider would be I am more arm than wrist type of histrion.
Joined:

Oct nineteen, 2018

Messages:

1,528

Likes Received:

674

Occupation:

Software Engineer

Location:

Hyderabad

Although the Li Ning temporarily "breaked upwardly" with the national team, information technology still has the ability to surpass the Yones.
The strong force of its parent company is behind it, a strong blueprint squad and an invincible supply chain are what many friends and businessmen dream of.
http://bulletin board system.badmintoncn.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1451822

Very interesting read, author seems like an experienced person and his opinion also resonates with us that Li Ning needs better naming scheme.
Looks like Li Ning will terminate old series and completely bet on AXFORCE, HALBERTEC, BLADEX. Shaft thickness will in 6.ii-half-dozen.8 range for these series.
Joined:

Jul 8, 2009

Messages:

78

Likes Received:

20

Location:

Cali

What a shame. They had good naming with the current line. Axforce sounds like astrox knockoff, halbertec sounds similar some stupid sword from an rpg, and bladex sounds like a condom brand.